Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles H Kraft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was - kept

Charles H Kraft

Vanity Page Plaintext 21:17, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Vanity Page -- but not necessarily unrecoverable. Author needs to add some description of why Dr. Kraft is notable. The list of books, while long, is not really sufficient, especially given that some of them seem to have small sales (per Amazon sales rank). We wouldn't consider an article for every Ph.D. at the Fuller Institute, so what is notable about Dr. Kraft? Best luck. Chrisvls 22:01, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep Carr
• Delete as written. Serious POV problems, smacks of zealot-written puff piece. Less than 1000 Google hits, though that's more than J. Fred Muggs, whom I voted to keep. (What can I say?) A few books on Amazon. --NathanHawking 03:42, 2004 Oct 15 (UTC)
• Delete: promo, nonnotable. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:41, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, of course, and stop deletion trolls. Intrigue 21:42, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• I lean toward delete. Needs NPOV at least. The long list of publications is good, but then pretty much every professor has a list of publications; it's what they do. Isomorphic 16:05, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable. anthony (see warning) 16:22, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable. GRider 19:57, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.